DEPART Wi
wor
i
' Rt ALAN
IN !
ar tar nus
VUrinc wAwl
mn
rors ybor
REN
or +] At RIANEAY £8
he foe OF NAVAL nme
im
701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
DIC
Docket No. NR1865-14
11 Sep 14
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
10 September 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1910 MMSR-2
dated 11 July 2014, a copy of which is attached.
paiter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application and
your request for a personal appearance before the Board have been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J.
Executive Director
Enclosure: HOMC memo 1910 MMSR-2 dtd 11 Jul 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR998 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1910 MMSR- 3 dated 16 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. In this Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3788 13
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5471 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on _ 8 December 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1800 MMSR-5 dated 23 October 2014, a copy of which is attached. NR5471-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6014 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NkRé014-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1240 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3429 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR3429-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2560 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. tn addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1910 MMSR-2 of 1: duly 2014, @ COPY of which was provided to you on 14 July 2014, and is being provided to you now. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6279 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on — 2 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable | statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5408 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2014.. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0823 13
‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered. Documentary material considered by-the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.